A public policy that deserves
debate is paid maternity leave. As a young parent at the age of nineteen, I
know how difficult it is to struggle financially with raising a child. In my
experience, I received a letter from my employer stating that if I didn’t
return in two weeks, I would have to reapply. It was not guaranteed I would get
my job back after the reapplying process. Had I not returned by the deadline,
someone could have been hired in replace, leaving me with a newborn and no
income for financial support. Returning to work less than two weeks after
having a child was rough physically, and emotionally, but take notice that the
relationship and bond between parents and children is also cut short. Weather
it’s the mother, the father, adoptive parents, gay, straight, or any other
sexual identity, the idea of paid maternity leave should be further discussed.
And Jessica Lussenhop questions what changes could come on this topic with the
recent election in her article "Will Trump Bring Paid Maternity Leave to the U.S?", published May 25th 2017.
Being the first federal plan in the
U.S, Donald Trump proposed a budget plan for 2018. The idea considers paid
maternity leave to become a nationwide requirement, and the benefits would be
administered by the state. Six weeks is the maximum paid time off in the plan.
In comparison, The International Labor Organization recommends at least 14
weeks, and other countries like Japan provide a full year. I can agree with the
point Lussenhop makes about having too long of a leave, causing low rates in
women returning to the workforce. With the budget and plans being discussed
lightly, we are a long way from finalizing, or acting on this policy. Applying
for the benefits would be the same as a newly-laid off worker would apply.
What’s questionable to me is the income based limit leaving some ineligible for
the benefits. With very little being said, and almost nothing being done,
there’s a long way to go on the matter.
We should have the right to be set
up for success when raising the next generations to come. Low income, middle
and upper class all deserve the benefits of raising a newborn in the comfort of
their homes, with the financial stability necessary. The costs of raising
children soar to the extreme. Bottles, diapers, wipes, clothes, cribs, formula,
medicine and doctor visits, are only a few things to consider when supporting
the life of a child. A breastfeeding mother may have to reconsider the natural
way of feeding her newborn when forced to return to work. Having paid maternity
leave should be right, not just a privilege.
As I read these blogs (and write my own) it becomes easier to see who the oppressed groups are. I say this because many of the blogs I have read relate to women and their treatment from the government. Some might argue the case that "women have the same privileges/benefits as men in terms of government care", and while even that is a stretch, if it were the full truth it would not be equity. Different genders have different biological needs. What do you think is the answer to this problem?
ReplyDeleteThis is an issue that has gotten a lot of attention lately. And it's interesting to consider how both men and women are impacted when we don't have such a policy. What, do you think, are the biggest barriers to paid leave being a federal law?
ReplyDelete